Pasha Bulker

pasha-bulker.jpg 

Lloyds List – 6 December 2007  by Michelle Wiese Bockmann

Pasha Bulker Master Avoids Prosecution for Grounding

NO charges will be laid against the master of the Pasha Bulker, despite an Australian report assessing his seamanship as “poor” and responsible for the vessel grounding on Nobby’s beach during “horrendous weather conditions” last June.

The highly critical report found that the unnamed master and chief engineer left the bridge for 10-15 minutes for breakfast during winds of up to 50 knots, while the bulk carrier “was in a precarious position”.

But New South Wales Ports Minister Joe Tripodi said prosecuters could not prove negligence beyond reasonable doubt, despite evidence that the master may have committed an offence.

NSW Maritime highlighted the master’s poor judgement and decision-making, including his failure to heed 16 separate storm warnings over two days, his decision to ride out the gale at anchor and not to ballast the ship for heavy weather .

The report said: “The handling of the ship while weighing anchor and trying to depart anchorage also contributed to the Pasha Bulker’s dire situation and eventual outcome.”

Deck officers gave investigators varying accounts of how the crisis was managed.

There were 56 ships at anchor waiting to enter the port of Newcastle on the day before the storm hit on June 8. Pasha Bulker, which had arrived on May 23, was anchored 4.6 km off the coast and was one of only nine vessels that remained in anchorage when the storm hit. The master put the vessel to sea at 0710 hrs, 20 minutes after it began to drag anchor.

The report found the master compounded errors, firstly allowing the ship to drag anchor within 2.2 km of the coast, and then failing to effectively use the vessel’s engines to counter the drift.

Concerns about the master’s performance will be forwarded to the flag state authority, asking for his qualification to be reviewed, the report said. A spokesman for the minister said the master was no longer employed by the shipowner, Japan-based Fukujin Kisen Kaisha.

Also noted was the Pasha Bulker’s refusal to take up offers of help from the Vessel Traffic Information Centre during five separate radio communications from 0720 hrs, until 30 minutes before it ran aground at 0950 hrs.

The ship remained stranded on Nobby’s beach for 25 days.

The report rejected maritime industry criticism that ships maintained unsafe ballast conditions because of the requirements of coal terminal operators, Port Waratah Coal Services.

It said: “PWCS has no contact with any ship regarding its ballast arrangements while at anchor, nor does PWCS make any specific directions… ultimately a ship’s ballast is left at the discretion of the individual master.”

The report found that two other bulkers that experienced difficulties, Sea Confidence and Pasha Bulker sister ship Betis, came close to shore during the storm.
 

Posted in General | Leave a comment

Mariners Betrayed

Part of an article by Ken Scadden which appeared in the Wellington Captital Times on Thursday 29 November 2007. 

The announcement of the change of name of the Museum of Wellington City and Sea to Wellington Museum is a blatant betrayal of the history and origins of the Wellington Maritime Museum and the commitments which were made by the Wellington Museums Trust (WMT).

The name change is in spite of a pledge made by the Wellington Museum Trust’s first chairman, the late Michael Hirschfeld, that the name Wellington Maritime Museum would be retained in perpetuity
for maritime-related purposes.

Given that the bulk of funding for the Museum redevelopment came from maritime sources and the Museum collection was 99% maritime, the balance as suggested by the Museums Mission Statement and name
was two-thirds maritime and one-third social history.

However in the past few years the management of the archives of the Union Steamship Company and the Wellngton Harbour Board were transferred to the Wellington City Council Archives (in spite of earlier assurances by the WMT that the collection would be kept together and fully resourced).

In recent times there has been a discernible anti-maritime change in the Museums direction. Seldom in Museum publications or reports is the word maritime mentioned. Constantly the Museum is described as “Wellington’s social history Museum”.

The closure of the Museum research service (which was largely  maritime), the paucity of exhibitions with a maritime focus and now the contemplation of the possible deaccessioning/disposal of all or part
of the maritime collections (which were donated to the Museum by hundreds of Wellingtonians over the years) – this “social history good”, “maritime history bad” dogma is straight out of the pages of Animal Farm.

The recent claim that the Museum will “tell Wellington stories” is belied by the exhibition programme which has recently featured Burton Brothers photos of the Pacific Islands and currently War in Paradise, neither of which have a Wellington let alone maritime focus.

Wellington Harbour is the heart of the capital and the history of this great city is inextricably linked to its maritime history. The Museum is in grave danger of further alienating the many people who make up the maritime community and who currently give the Museum a great deal of support, both financially and practically.

Posted in General | Leave a comment

Message from Governor-General

A copy of the latest issue of On Deck was sent to our Patron, Governor-General Anand Satyanand who has replied with the following letter.

gg2.jpg

Posted in General | Leave a comment

More Coastal Shipping in Australia

THE Australian Shipowners Association has been buoyed by the release of two studies that backed its lines on coastal shipping and employment.

The inter-governmental Australian Maritime Group commissioned one report, ‘International and Domestic Shipping and Ports Study’ and released in May, from consultants led by the respected Meyrick and Associates.

“Shipping’s share of the inter-capital non-bulk freight task [movements parallel to the coast] is currently small, just 3% in terms of mass,” it said. “In our judgment, the balance can be tipped in favour of a role for dedicated coastal shipping in the transportation of this freight.”

This seemingly revolutionary outcome could be achieved through a combination of:

• Improved service offerings than have yet been offered in the market, which provide a service quality similar to rail at a lower price;

• The lead being taken by, or in partnership with, an existing door-to-door transportation firm with the financial capability to invest in ships, domestic equipment and possibly co-invest in dedicated port infrastructure; and

• A supportive policy framework from governments which stimulates innovation in and promotes the use of non-bulk coastal shipping in a manner that facilitates efficient choices between the various modes of transport.

“We also believe the current domestic container shipping operations offered by international permit vessels is volatile and unable to offer the level of service or space to contest additional cargoes currently carried by land transport modes. International cargoes will always take priority over domestic ones,” it said. “Withdrawal of capacity by international operators would also have implications for land transport.

“Government policy on road and rail has the capability to impact upon the future modal share of domestic shipping. Regulations on road size and weight limits, driver fatigue, fuel emissions, carriage of hazardous cargoes and decisions whether to invest in new rail infrastructure all can to tip the balance in favour of shipping. These considerations suggest a gap or role does exist for dedicated domestic container shipping and increased coastal bulk shipping.”

The other report was the product of a bi-partisan senate committee whose ‘Workforce Challenges in the Transport Industry’, the ASA believed: “Identified the key issues affecting maritime skills and apportioned responsibility for action in a way that will drive outcomes.”

Teresa Hatch, maritime operations director, said: “The recommendation that section 23AG of the tax act be reviewed is one of those rare everyone’s a winner situations. The bipartisan nature of the Senate committee should guarantee support for a simple amendment which will throw open the doors of opportunity to young Australians considering a seafaring career.”

This belated recognition that ships have a part to play in shouldering an ever-increasing transport load has yet to be replicated by the present federal government after nearly 12 years in power. And this continues to grate with association chief executive Lachlan Payne. “If the policy of implementing change by not having done anything has achieved its desired outcome, then the current government could say it has achieved this,” he said.

“The outcome has been for the industry to diminish; reliance on international operators to increase; for regulatory constraints on Australians to continue to impose competitive disadvantage on them; it’s caused ship operators to leave Australian flags in favour of foreign flags for registering ships; it’s encouraged ship operators to resituate themselves outside Australia. And if the government thinks those are desirable outcomes, then they’ve worked beautifully because the facts are that’s what happened.” 

Posted in General | Leave a comment

Cosco Busan

Fogging Up the Facts –  Lloyds List 19 November 2007

SOMETHING went seriously wrong the other day on the bridge of the big containership Cosco Busan as the vessel was being manoeuvred out of San Francisco Bay. It might have been mechanical, it could have been human error, while it it could even have been the aggregation of several small failures of equipment, people, systems or procedures, in the thick fog.

It would be useful if, for the benefit of other ship operators and the future prevention of collisions causing pollution, the exact sequence of events can be established. The investigators of the US National Transportation Safety Board are on the case, they are experienced and have an excellent record in accident investigations. But will anyone involved in the incident talk to them, now they know that a criminal investigation has begun, and the fearsome penal system of the US hangs over everyone involved.

The word ‘accident’ may be redundant in 2007, but we would doubt if the actions of anyone involved was criminal. Is a mistake, or a failure of judgement, criminal, just because it involves oil in the water and dead wildlife? Unfortunately, this is the situation today, when people who have never made a mistake in their lives get on their high horses and criminalise others whose daily job involves risk-taking.

This is 2007 society speaking and a pretty unpleasant message is eructed. And who in their right mind, with this sort of horror hanging over them, is going to say anything to a casualty investigator without the ministrations of the best possible defence counsel? The establishment of the truth will involve a process where it will have to be dragged out of the witnesses by tongs, rather than quickly revealed by people speaking frankly to one another. And that’s a pity, because what emerges may not be anything even remotely helpful.

This accident may not be another Exxon Valdez, but it has the potential to affect ship operations all over the US, or possibly even globally. Which is why it is important that the facts can be quickly established, rather than be the subject of a tortured judicial process, with its plea-bargaining and disproportionate sentencing, lasting years. 

Posted in General | Leave a comment

Earle Crutchley

knightcrutchley2.jpgOld

Salts Honour Battler by Mike Crean – The Press, Christchurch

Sailors who manned cargo and passenger ships in World War 2 will repay a debt on Lyttelton Harbour on Sunday.
Former ship’s master Tudor Owen, of Christchurch, said “old salts” owed gratitude to former artilleryman Earle Crutchley, who had fought a tireless battle for members of the merchant navy to receive equal honours with those of the armed services.
Crutchley had successfully promoted the commemoration of the merchant navy on war memorials and the inclusion of merchant navy members in Anzac parades.
Members of the master mariners’, marine engineers’ and merchant marine organisations will treat Crutchley to a cruise on the historic tug Lyttelton on Sunday. They will present him with a plaque, expressing their appreciation of his efforts on their behalf.
Owen said Crutchley had battled single-handedly for recognition of the merchant navy’s contribution to the war effort. Among his 22 successes around New Zealand were plaques honouring the merchant navy added to the Christchurch war memorial in Cathedral Square and to the Lyttelton war memorial.
Crutchley, of Christchurch, said the war could not have been waged without the ships that transported troops, weapons, ammunition and supplies and that maintained trading links between Britain and its partners.

Report by Richard Knight, Warden Christchurch Branch 

On Sunday 4th November 2007  a group of members of the Christchurch Branch of the NZ Company of Master Mariners, along with Members of the Marine Engineers Institute  and Members of the Merchant Navy Association and their partners, hosted Earle Crutchley and his wife, Norma, and other members of his family, on the Steam Tug “Lyttelton”  for an afternoon’s cruise to commemorate 100 years of the tug’s operation.

The cruse for a gratifyingly large contingent of seafarers, plus a group of steam enthusiasts from overseas, took place in excellent conditions, on a warm and sunny day, with light winds, totally unexpected, as the preceeding week had been marred by extreem winds, which had one or two of our wives threatening mutiny. There was however a reasonable groundswell at the harbor entrance to remind us that we were at sea.

On our return to Lyttelton, at 4pm, and after the departure of the other passengers I presented on behalf of the  New Zealand Company of Master Mariners, our Company plaque to Earle, in recognition of his achievements  in getting Merchant Navy Veterans commemorated alongside the Armed forces on War Memorials throughout NZ.. He has had success in 21 centres around the country, in both Islands, all at his own expense.

Earle, who was never at sea, but was a soldier, is now getting on in years and in failing health. is a fine old gentleman who is greatly interested in all things maritime and it was a great pleasure for me to make this presentation. He was obviously very moved by the whole occasion and very appreciative of the plaque, which I suspect will take pride of place in his home. His Daughter commented to me afterwards how very much they appreciated the whole afternoon, and how much it meant to her father.

Unfortunately, Tudor Owen, who was instrumental in getting this ceremony under way, was unable through ill health to attend.

rknightcrutchley.jpg

Christchurch Warden Richard Knight presenting Earle Crutchley with plaque.

malcolm-earl-crutchley-ss.jpg

Earle Crutchley with past warden Malcom Pearson.

Posted in Christchurch Branch | Leave a comment

New Maritime Documents

img_0618.jpgThe

John Sinclair, General Manager Mitsui OSK NZ Ltd, Hon Annette King, Minister of Transport, Captain John Brown and Allan Thompson, Chief Executive, Ministry of Transport at Parliament 05 November 2007   

The Master represented the Company at Parliamemt for the official launch of the discussion document  Sea Change by Minister of Transport Hon. Annette King.

The New Zealand Government is committed to facilitating a revival of coastal shipping in New Zealand and says that without question, coastal shopping has been neglected in the past years.

About 15% of domestic cargo is transported by sea. The aim is to increase this amount to 30% by the year 2040.

Sea Change is a signal of the government’s strong commitment to coastal shipping and of its belief that coastal shipping has an essential role to play in creating more efficient and competitive supply chains and in creating an integrated transport system offering greater capacity and greater choice. An important step will be the establishment of a Maritime Liaison Unit.

A revitalised coastal shipping industry will need more skilled people. More than one third of the present workforce engaged in coastal shipping is over 60 years of age. There is strong international competition for qualified personnel. For qualifications such as Class 1 & 2  (master & mate foreign going) a considerable amount of foreign going sea time is required. The issue of qualifying sea service requirements has been recently reviewed and the rule amended to allow foreign going sea time to be replaced with a voyage duration specification, as is done in some other countries.

In addition to Sea Change two other documents were released for discussion. 

Port and Harbour and Safety Navigation Management.  Currently, port and harbour safety is managed largely through a voluntary code that has no legal force. This document looks at the implications of this situation for safety outcomes and also whether there is scope to improve arrangements for dealing with navigation safety in areas outside ports and harbours.
Four International Maritime Environmental Conventions/Protocols which New Zealand is considering becoming party to.  The four conventions/protocols have been promulgated by the International Maritime Organisation, and provide global mechanisms for addressing the pollution risks that exist from the transport of substances by sea.  The discussion document considers conventions/protocols concerned with intervention powers and preparedness and response measures for hazardous and noxious substance spills, and liability and compensation regimes for damage caused by marine incidents including from bunker fuel oil.

All these documentrs can be viewed and downloaded at the following websites:
 Sea Change.   www.transport.govt.nz/seachange
 Port and Harbour and Safety Navigation Management.  www.transport.govt.nz/portandharbour
 Four International Maritime Environmental Conventions/Protocols.   www.transport.govt.nz/4conventions
Hard copies of the discussion documents are also available.  If you would like to receive a paper copy of any of the documents please send an email to the below addresses and provide a full postal address. 
 [email protected]
 [email protected]
 [email protected]
 or phone 
 The closing date for submissions on all of these documents is 19 December 2007.
 The Ministry has also arranged public workshops to brief interested stakeholders and answer questions on these documents. 

If you are interested in attending a workshop in one of the main centres please contact Ministry of Transport [email protected] to obtain further details. The workshop dates are:
Auckland – 14 November 2007
Christchurch – 15 November 2007
Wellington – 16 November 2007
 

Posted in General | Leave a comment

A Container Never Dies

Lloyds List 24 October 2007 by Brian Robinson 
“A container never dies,” according to Adrian Dunner, the man in charge of container lessor TAL International’s Trader division, which markets containers that have expired from the prime fleet.

What Mr Dunner is alluding to is the fact that after 10 or 12 or more years being used to ship cargo around the world, containers have second, third, fourth… sometimes more lives than a cat… as second tier shipment vehicles, storage containers and a multitude of other uses. The world container fleet is today around 20m teu, with about 55% being owned by shipping lines and 45% by leasing companies, a number that has changed from the historical 50/50 split.

The number of containers that expire from the fleet every year is not known precisely, but is generally said to be about one million, and maybe slightly higher. What is known with more certainty is that about 3m teu of new boxes are added each year, so the phase out amount of 1m teu hangs together with a 10% fleet growth. Container manufacture rates, prices and location play an important part in the retirement and sale decision process. Container manufacture is today almost 100% in China.

There are currently about 20 factories with annual capacity of 5m teu, but most are working at below capacity. Supply is almost totally elastic, with increases from one working shift to two and then three always possible.

This situation has brought about stability in container prices with a 20ft box costing around $2,000. There has not been much deviation from this for the past couple of years. Stability in new container prices means that asset management decisions about when equipment can be expired are made more rationally.

Why containers are expired is a multi-faceted conundrum involving supply, demand, economics, logistics and geography. Rarely do containers reach the end of their book life — other factors come into play that dictates the economics. Container shipping has never been a balanced business. Trade routes have always been out of kilter, but the China syndrome of the past decade has brought about one enormous imbalance as opposed to many smaller imbalances, which were sometimes able to compensate each other.

Containers that deliver Chinese products to western countries are mostly positioned empty back to Asia. Something like 75% of boxes are moved back empty, and a sizeable number of those that are loaded carry low value cargo that makes a contribution to, rather than meeting shipping costs.

This issue is further complicated by the fact that many locations to which Chinese loaded containers are consigned are — particularly in the US — hundreds of kilometres from a port, meaning that the trucking, stevedoring and shipping costs of an empty box back to Asia can amount to hundreds of dollars.

The third element in the equation is damage. Containers are used in a harsh, salt-laden environment and, although they are manufactured of rust resistant steel, they do get damaged, and repair costs can again amount to several hundred dollars.

The result of these issues is effectively that every time a container is unstuffed, an algorithm is run to determine what should happen to it next. If no return load is available, the owner adds transport and shipping costs to damage costs, compares this with book value and then compares this with the cost of buying a new box in China.

For example, and an extreme one, the empty container is in the US mid-west and has damages amounting to $500. The cost of getting the box back to the US west coast is say $400, stevedoring costs $100, and shipping slot costs — arguably if it is a line’s box — $150. Total: $1,050. If the container is 10 years old and depreciated to less than $1,000, the issue is whether an old box in poor condition in a location where it is not needed ought to be traded for a new box where it is needed. Usually the answer is yes.

Furthermore, the large number of mergers and acquisitions that have occurred among carriers and lessors over the years has resulted in multi-coloured fleets with a variety of decals and logos. Phasing out the old and buying new also solves this issue and keeps the fleet newer.

These decisions being made every day result in a million or so boxes coming onto the after-market every year, but where do they all go?

The number of containers that have been retired from the mainstream fleets and absorbed in the after-market over the past 40 years is many millions but still there seems insatiable demand.

There is a vibrant market and an extensive network of dealers to keep the business going.
Keith Harvey, at UK-based Container Trading, has been buying and selling boxes for more than 20 years. He explains that he usually buys in batches of 20, 30 or 40, and pays a fixed price per container.

There is, he says, “an element of ‘pot luck’ with respect to condition. But I have worked with the people that I buy from for many years and we have built up a degree of trust.”

Mr Harvey says that the number of suppliers has reduced over recent years because owners have set up their own divisions to market their disposal equipment. “But many operators do not have the organisation or infrastructure in place to use containers in master leases when they come off initial term leases, so we are able to obtain a good supply.”

Having bought a batch of containers, he splits them into two broad categories: those suitable for shipment of cargo and those suitable only for static storage, the prime criteria being the condition of the floor and cross members. If the undercarriage is in decent condition, the containers are sold to freight forwarders and others involved in shipments to locations where the return of the box is difficult or unlikely.

Currently there is good demand for project cargo to the oilfields and coalfields of Siberia, but over the years boxes for shipments ‘one way to nowhere’ has created ongoing demand. Parts of Africa and the Middle East have been good markets for many years and continue to be so.

Mr Harvey says he pays about $1,000 for a 20ft, but adds that “it is subject to supply, which in turn is subject to the number of shipping boxes coming into a location and the imbalance ratio.

“Benelux is the cheapest in Europe because supply is greatest but, for instance, Scotland and Scandinavia are more expensive because they have smaller supply and decent export traffic. Prices in the US tend to be on the higher side because whilst supply in many parts is ample, demand is also high.”

Containers that are not suitable for shipment cargo are used for domestic storage, and this segment seems also to have an insatiable appetite. Everybody has seen containers being used for storage on construction sites and major engineering projects but stores, supermarkets, hotels, farms and many, many other such operations, also use them.

Attracted by their abundance, strength, durability, affordability and adaptability, some architects and designers around the world are seeing containers as the basis of cheap, innovative accomodation.

London-based Urban Space Management has used containers in many projects and says: “Containers are an extremely flexible method of construction, being both modular in shape, extremely strong structurally and readily available.

“Container ‘cities’ offer an alternative solution to traditional space provision. They are ideal for office and workspace, live-work and key-worker housing. Container cities do not even have to look like containers! It is a relatively simple matter to completely clad a building externally in a huge variety of materials.”

Short-life sites can have container cities that simply unbolt and can be relocated or stored when land is required for alternative uses. This alternative method of construction has successfully created youth centres, classrooms, office space, artists studios, live/work space, nursery and retail facilities.

This phenomenon for using containers as storage and more sophisticated applications has spawned a whole new sub-industry of purpose-built containers imported from China, often slightly ‘down spec’d’ in terms of paint and other areas.

There is usually no problem with getting containers loaded one way from China to US or Europe, and a ‘new’ box can be landed at destination for something less than $2,500. Most container depot operators around the world trade in containers to supplement their income and to keep their workshops busy. Some simply buy containers when the opportunity arises, because a unit to be sold is sitting in their facility, but others actively seek out container purchases and often make extensive and sophisticated modifications.

Conversions into offices, sports pavilions and toilets are a major source of income for many depot operators. Ron Stiff has been in the depot business in the UK for many years, but over the last seven has diversified his interest and operation more towards container modifications and domestic hire of these. He says that business is good to the point where, “the conversion and hire operation will turnover more than £1m this year, but we no longer rely on containers coming out of the marine fleets.

“Now we buy directly from China with security cowls, that we used to fit over the locking bars ourselves, already in place and designed to be within ISO so that the containers can be used for shipment from China”.

The depot that Mr Stiff works from in West Thurrock, Essex, has moved away from being primarily a storage and repair facility and now, in addition to the domestic container operation, has a stack of 300 containers available for short and long term storage.

Customers range from individuals to major companies who use the facility for document archiving, and with elaborate tracking and retrieval facilities being offered to customers.

The US has also seen much development in container mini storage sites with facilities springing up throughout the country and using both ex-marine and specially-designed boxes. TAL International recognised 10 years ago that a crucial part of its asset management business was maximising returns on containers retired from the fleet. Trader, a division to deal with this part of the business, was established and Mr Dunner says it now handles over 50,000 containers per year and “is the largest company in the industry dedicated to maximising disposal values”.

Mr Dunner says that TAL has three options when a container comes off-hire. To fix it where it is and lease it, to reposition it back to Asia, or to retire it from the fleet. All containers that are retired are handed over to Trader, which then makes the “best economic decision for them”.

“They may sell it ‘as is where is’, they may position it to a better location or they may have some repairs or modifications carried out to enhance value and then sell it.”

Mr Dunner says that the average age of TAL containers that are retired from the fleet is 13 years, up from the common 10 -12 years. “We keep them in the fleet as long as possible because they earn revenue and a 13 year-old box has pretty much the same value as a 10 year-old.” TAL International uses its Trader expertise to offer a service to its shipping line customers that do not have the resources to maximise return on boxes when they reach retirement age.

If a shipping line has 5,000 or 10,000 or 20,000 containers that it is considering retiring, TAL will purchase them at an agreed price whilst they are still being used for cargo carrying. The containers stay in the possession of the line and TAL charges a daily lease rate.

During the following year or so, as the containers are returned to depots, Trader takes over control of the boxes, the lease rate stops and Trader disposes of them as they do any other box. Mr Dunner describes this as a ‘buy and lease back’ arrangement.

“It is good for the line that does not see this activity as part of their core business because they realise a profit, keep usage of the container for the short term and have a simple and orderly retirement from the fleet.”

Trader also purchases containers directly from shipping lines and others for onward sale. Mr Dunner stresses that TAL sees itself as being in the asset management business and this type of operation is at the heart of asset management. “Trader operates through a network of 240 depots/sale locations worldwide, which provides good logistics saving potential to the shipping lines,” he says

Posted in General | Leave a comment

Emma Maersk

embridge.jpgem3600.jpgem6600.jpg

Posted in General | Leave a comment

Draft Pilotage Rules

These rules can be viewed/downloaded at:-

http://www.maritimenz.govt.nz/rules/rules_consult.asp

Posted in General | Leave a comment